Shownotes for Restatement Scandal:
Justice Scalia provides us with an explanation of what the “modern Restatement” is (Kansas v. Nebraska, 574 U.S. ____ (2015) (Scalia, J. concurring in part, dissenting in part):
I write separately to note that modern Restatements—such as the Restatement [at issue in the case at bar]—are of questionable value, and must be used with caution. The object of the original Restatements was “to present an orderly statement of the general common law.” Restatement of Conflict of Laws, Introduction, p. viii (1934). Over time, the Restatements’ authors have abandoned the mission of describing the law, and have chosen instead to set forth their aspirations for what the law ought to be….And it cannot safely be assumed, without further inquiry, that a Restatement provision describes rather than revises current law.
American Law Institute, Restatement of Copyright project
Restatement of Copyright Participants
Samuelson Letter to ALI Requesting Restatement of Copyright
Spotify Lawyer Leads Law Institute “Restatement of Copyright” Project www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2018/01/s…ake-treatise.html]
Above the Law: ALI’s Great Copyright Caper: Has The American Law Institute Been Hijacked By Big Tech?
Introducing Christopher Sprigman
Sprigman Pro Hac Vice in Spotify case
You must be logged in to post a comment.